Like Button

Monday, August 23, 2010

The Problem of Apologetics

I've said it before. We are commanded to contend for the faith, to give an answer for the hope that lies within us. (The phrase in 1 Peter 3:15 -- "give an answer" -- is pros apologia in Greek. See that "apologia"? That's our origin of "Apologetics" in this context.) And so we, if we are to be obedient children, engage in the defense of the faith. The defense is a reasoned defense. Although we are defending faith, it is the mind that is doing the defending. Biblically, the two are interlinked. We are to learn, to examine, to understand, to renew the mind, to "think on these things". We are required to engage the brain in our walk with Christ, and we are required to engage the brain in our defense of the faith.

Therein, it seems, lies the problem. The Bible presents a pretty grim view of the thinking processes of Natural Man. I've already beat to death (perhaps) the claim that "Natural Man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned" (1 Cor 2:14). That doesn't bode well for the logical discussion of the truth. And it only gets worse from there. Paul says "the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ" (2 Cor 4:4). That's Man's natural condition -- blinded minds. In his explanation of the Gospel, Paul tells the problem that the Gospel addresses: "The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth" (Rom 1:18). The "bad news" that the "good news" addresses is that Man is under wrath. Why? Because he has decided that unrighteousness is preferable to righteousness and, to maintain that unrighteousness, he must suppress the truth. The effect of this little piece of insanity is cumulative.
For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things (Rom 1:21-23).
Natural Man, then, is quite sure of his own wisdom ... but is quite futile in his thinking. That's God's evaluation, not mine.

You should see, then, the dilemma we face. We are commanded to make a rational defense of the faith. We are obligated to stand for the truth, to argue our case, to contend for the faith. And at the same time, we are absolutely assured that the ones to whom we are presenting our defense are blind, incapable of understanding, futile in their thinking. We are to present this reasonable argument to those who, when it comes to this particular topic, cannot be reasonable. That's the primary problem of Apologetics.

Is there no hope, then? Not at all! I gave you 2 Corinthians 4:4 a moment ago. Look at the rest of the passage.
In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For what we proclaim is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus' sake. For God, who said, 'Let light shine out of darkness,' has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ (2 Cor 4:4-6).
Do you see the solution? Yes, indeed, they are blinded in the mind. No doubt. They cannot see "the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ." But we're talking here about God at work now. Remember Him? He's the one who said, "Let there be light" and there was light.

We are faced with the impossible task of presenting a rational defense to an irrational audience. We do so because we are commanded to do so. God requires it of us. That's the problem. The good news is that while we are responsible to present the best possible defense, we are not responsible for the results. That is God's job. And while we might have no means of overcoming futile thinking and blinded minds, God isn't limited like we are. Thus, when we engage in this necessary practice of contending for the faith and making our defense, we are participating in the work of God with certainty that when God wills He cannot fail. When He chooses to turn the lights on, they will see ... and you get to participate.*
________________
* Little hint here. As it turns out, this is the way we all get to understand. Paul told Timothy, "Think over what I say, for the Lord will give you understanding in everything" (2 Tim 2:7). See how that works? He says to think things over because in the process "the Lord will give you understanding". Just so you didn't think you figured it out all by yourself ... or that you don't need to think.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good points and good timing -- just listened to 2 Corinthians 4 this morning!

Marshal Art said...

Not trying to be snarky here, but does not the Lord give us understanding of all things, or just spiritual things? Your hint suggests that we must first choose to think things over before God will give us that understanding. My point here is what (or who) turns on the light bulb for anything? I can't understand the internal combustion engine until I think on it.


Still wrassling with it.

Stan said...

My point is that sin rots the brain, so trying to "talk people into heaven" won't work. As for the note at the bottom, my point is that God wants us to think ... and in doing so He provides understanding. (Since the reference is to "what I say" (from Paul), I'd assume it's spiritual matters.) There are those who say, "Don't think; let God lead you." There are others who say, "Think! You can figure it out." Paul suggests ... both think and let God lead you.

David said...

I think the command to have a reasonable apologetic is not only for spreading the Good News to unbelievers, but with all the head bashing we have to do, it strengthens our resolve in Christ, aiding us in persevering to the end. God often tells us to do things, like pray, that probably won't directly change anything, except for our own perception of God's work in that thing. We have a reasonable defense for our faith so that we may persevere. Sure, God could just make us persevere, but He makes it a cooperative effort (not saying you can persevere on your own mind you). Same with prayer, God doesn't NEED us to pray to Him, but He knows we NEED to talk to Him. Prayer and apologetics and a myriad of other commands both edify and encourage us, and aid us in glorifying our Lord. If we contend for our faith with rational reasoning, our faith will be that much stronger, even if we "lost" the debate, or the opponent doesn't get it. Praise the Lord He allows us to participate in His work.

Stan said...

Oh, yes, David, there are definitely benefits to the apologist, to be sure. Strengthening our faith, settling questions, fine-tuning understanding, better comprehension of Natural Man, participating with God's work ... on and on it goes.