Jesus said, "Many are called but few are chosen." He told His disciples, "You didn't choose Me, but I chose you." Now, think about that for a moment. Did they choose Him? It wouldn't be completely accurate to say that they didn't. He said, "Follow Me" and they chose to do so. So while Jesus clearly made the first choice, election doesn't eliminate choice.
One thing I've heard over and over is, "Well, if you believe in election, you can never really be sure if you're saved, can you? You will always wonder if you are one of the elect." It might surprise these people to know that Scripture addresses this very question.
2 Grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord; 3 seeing that His divine power has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness, through the true knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and excellence. 4 For by these He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, so that by them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world by lust. 5 Now for this very reason also, applying all diligence, in your faith supply moral excellence, and in your moral excellence, knowledge, 6 and in your knowledge, self-control, and in your self-control, perseverance, and in your perseverance, godliness, 7 and in your godliness, brotherly kindness, and in your brotherly kindness, love. 8 For if these qualities are yours and are increasing, they render you neither useless nor unfruitful in the true knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9 For he who lacks these qualities is blind or short-sighted, having forgotten his purification from his former sins. 10 Therefore, brethren, be all the more diligent to make certain about His calling and choosing you; for as long as you practice these things, you will never stumble; 11 for in this way the entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ will be abundantly supplied to you (2 Peter 1:2-11).I had to include the whole context because it is so clear. The premise: "His divine power has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness."
In verse 5 Peter starts with "Now for this very reason." What reason? Because His divine power has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness. What, then, does Peter say we should do? "In your faith supply moral excellence, and in your moral excellence, knowledge, and in your knowledge, self-control, and in your self-control, perseverance, and in your perseverance, godliness, and in your godliness, brotherly kindness, and in your brotherly kindness, love." "Pharisee!" some might cry. Peter is talking about being diligent to do these things. Some call it "works" and deny it completely. Peter doesn't. Instead he says, "If these qualities are yours and are increasing, they render you neither useless nor unfruitful." The image, then, starts at "faith" and spirals upward in a series of character qualities that "are increasing". In other words, it doesn't stop.
Why would someone label Peter a Pharisee? Because there are those who argue that looking at a person's life is the wrong place to look. They say, "You should only ask if they believe. What they do is not an indicator." Peter says, "He who lacks these qualities is blind or short-sighted." And then Peter answers the question at hand. Is it possible, if election is a fact, to know that you're saved? Peter assures his readers ("those who have received a faith of the same kind as ours") that in diligently adding to their godly character they can "make certain about His calling and choosing you."
Do you want to know if you are one of the elect? Peter says it's simple. If you are diligent, if you are making use of the power of Christ which has "granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness", if you are adding to faith in the form of godly character, then you can be certain of His calling and choosing of you. It doesn't have to be a constant question. The Bible offers certainty ... despite the certainty of the skeptic that you cannot know. God, it seems, disagrees.
9 comments:
"If you are diligent, if you are making use of the power of Christ which has "granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness", if you are adding to faith in the form of godly character, then you can be certain of His calling and choosing of you."
Lots of 'if's' there.
Since we do continue to sin and since we have that Old Adam living in us as well as our Lord and Savior, it would be awfully hard to complete those 'if's'.
I think that the Lord did want us to have assurance, and so He graciously gave us the Sacraments.
Something that He gives to us, from oustside of ourselves and what we do, say, feel, or think...that we might have the assurance of our salvation.
So, Steve, the Sacraments provide assurance (assurance is what is at stake here, not salvation) where Peter doesn't? It sounds like you're suggesting, "Yeah, Peter, all well and good, but I think I'll look elsewhere."
Steve, (wow, like, two comments for one!) I have a question on the Sacraments. Is it possible for someone to perform all the Sacraments without actually being saved? Is it possible to do the actions without faith? (Not being completely familiar with your version of "Sacraments", I'm asking genuine questions.)
It seems to me that we can be just as easily convinced that we are saved when we're not as we can be worried that we're not saved when we are. I'd rather be in the latter of those two groups if I had to choose.
I don't get it. Why are some so bent on a person not worrying about their salvation? Given the eternal stakes, I think is the most important thing we could ever worry about. When we focus too much on the hear and now and are not willing to consider the suffering of this present time, like incur when we worry about our salvation, not worthy to be compared to the glory that is to be revealed to us, then I suppose worrying about our salvation could seem like a heavy yoke. But I still think that it is not totally unhealthy to not be a little worried about our eternal destiny every now and then.
Stan,
A person doesn't perform the Sacraments. Christ does. That's why we call them Sacraments. It is His promises to us. He does everything for us in the Sacrament.
Can an unsaved person have been baptized or have taken Holy Communion? Sure!
The promises are still there, and they are still valid. But if there is no faith to access those promises then they go un-utilized.
How does one get faith? Jesus' conversation with Niccodemus answers that one. "The Holy Spirit gives faith, when and where He wills." (paraphrased)
So God can work through the Sacraments, and God can work apart from the Sacraments.
But since our dear Lord commanded that we baptize and partake of His body and blood...we kinda sorta figure He'll be there in those Sacraments for us.
This brings us assurance based on what He has done, is doing, and will yet do for us, totally apart from what we do , say, feel, or think.
It keeps us grounded, and it gives us thge assurance that God wants us to have. (but we don't presume of it, or take it for granted). We stay (try anyway) humble and realize that it is all up to God (our salvation).
That's the Lutheran party line, anywho.
Thank you, my friends!
So, Steve, even with the Sacraments it is possible for a person to perform the rites (I get it ... not the Sacraments, but the "procedures"), have no faith, and come away thinking, "I'm saved; I did the Sacraments."
For my money, then, I think I'll stick with Peter. "Do you see spiritual growth, a changed life? Then you can have some assurance. Do you see no change? There is probable cause to be concerned."
Dan, from my experience, it always seem to be reversed from what we might think. Those that worry most about their spiritual condition most likely don't need to. Those who are quite confident most likely shouldn't be. But the question is can we, at some point, have some measure of assurance? I think so.
"Some measure" is correct. I believe in an eternal damnation worse than the worst thing I could even imagine in this life. If I had no reason for the assurance of my eternal destiny from a proven reliable revelation from God, outside my own vain imagination, that would be a heavy yoke. And I agree with you on this scripture. We are called to examine ourselves. Pilots, even those who fly airliners, walk around their airplane before every flight. He doesn't do this becasue he's not sure he's not going to crash, but due to a repect for the stakes involved. In the same way we should give ourselves an occasional preflight. God gives us a reference point from which to measure what we see as we do this in II Peter.
Stan,
There are many in churches (Sacramental and non-Sacramental) who go through the motions.
Believing that one is saved on the basis of what they do, or feel, or say is a poorer method of attaining assurance.
Trusting in what God has done FOR YOU, is a much better way.
And we must remember (always) that God is the One who told us to do (participate in) the Sacraments.
He must have had an awfully good reason to do so, because one thing is for sure, our Lord is not into empty religious ritual.
He is actually doing something in the bread and the wine and the water...when His Word is attached to them.
Thanks, Stan.
Dan, kind of like "Work out your salvation with fear and trembling", eh?
Steve, it ultimately boils down to trusting what God has promised to do, doesn't it?
Post a Comment