We're pretty sure these days that we know what "bad sin" and "not so bad sin" is. "Bad sin" would be things like homosexual behavior, adultery, fornication, you know, sexual sin. It would be things like rape and murder, theft, mayhem, certainly idolatry, oh, and that unforgivable one ... what was it? ... oh, yeah, blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, whatever that means. No, no, we've got this one. We're pretty clear on this.
There are several places in the Bible that actually make lists of standardized sins. Here are a few examples:
They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Though they know God's decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them (Rom 1:29-32).And in these lists we can see reflected our own abhorrence to some things. There's that whole "murder" problem, and "haters of God" is surely a bad thing. Oh, "inventors of evil" seem to abound, as does the giving of approval to those who practice evil. We already know that the sexually immoral and idolaters and adulterers and those who practice homosexuality are in deep trouble with God. And those who love money, who are unholy and heartless, who are brutal, treacherous, and "swollen with conceit" (What a descriptive phrase!) are surely among the most sinful.
Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor 6:9-10).
For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people (2 Tim 3:2-5).
I would submit, however, that there is another list of sins that we're happy to give a pass on. Oh, sure, maybe those things are sinful, but there's no need to call them to anyone's attention, no need to make a big deal about them, certainly no need to mention them in a blog. Or is there?
America, for instance, almost runs on covetousness and greed. They are practically our motto, so they can't be that bad, can they? And while God seems to think that "disobedient to parents" is a bad thing, we often think of it as noble and right, since parents are not perfect and children tend, in today's society, to be viewed as wise. Our favorite comedies include insolence and foolishness. Hey, our entire prayer chain basically works on a gossip-and-slander method. I mean, it's not gossip if we're just sharing it as a prayer request for someone, is it? And, look, we're pretty sure that "lovers of self" is in there by accident. I mean, how can you love others as yourself if you don't first love yourself? Loving self is "the greatest love of all", they tell us.
I am concerned. I'm concerned that in seeing the obvious we miss the more deleterious. While seeing the clearly wrong we miss the acceptable wrong. We let that leaven in, sometimes intentionally, not realizing that we're in danger of leavening the whole lump. It ought to concern us, then, when we read about God's perspective on the greedy, the gossip, those who dishonor their parents, and those who love pleasure. "We know that the judgment of God rightly falls on those who practice such things" (Rom 2:2). "The unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God" (1 Cor 6:9). "Avoid such people" (2 Tim 3:5). While you're hastening to point fingers at the homosexual offenders, be careful it's not you who is missing the log in your own eye.
8 comments:
Interesting post. I've been thinking about just this thing lately. In Romans 1 The Lord explains how the curse of immorality, especially the hard core sexual spectrum called sodomy, are inflicted as punishment. He gives these sinners over to worse sins. Ezekiel 16:49 is where He condemns Jersualem as being akin to Sodom, whose initial sin was something we know all too well in the prosperous west.
Ezekiel 16:49-50
49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.
50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.
Pride -> idolatry -> selfishness + hardheartedness + etc. = JUDGEMENT
No wonder things are so grim nowadays. We ain't seen nuthin' yet...
You're right in that the Roman progression places homosexual sin as a product of sin. In Rom 1:22 they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and God "gave them over to degrading passions." (Rom 1:26) They continued to refuse to acknowledge God (Rom 1:28) and He gave them over to a depraved mind (Rom 1:29). Sin, then, starts with idolatry -- an exchange of the Creator for the created -- proceeds through sexual sin, and ends up with a rotted mind leading to all sorts of sin. We are seeing the product of that now.
I'm a little unclear as to your point. Is it contained in that last sentence? I ask because it comes up regularly in discussions on homosexuality. My response is always that I don't disregard my own shortcomings, but I'm not trying to assert that my sins are not sinful any longer, nor because of the way I perpetrate them, and what's more, I'm not trying to get legislation passed that will force everyone else to agree that my sin is not sinful.
The reason homosexuality is getting so much press by Christians isn't because we see it as some heinous sin, rather it is the ONLY sin we are being forced to sanction.
Actually, Glenn, I'd suggest that we're being asked to sanction and even pay for the murder of babies as well, but I understand the point of your comment.
Marshall, I'm simply saying that we must be careful not to point fingers at the sins of others while we are carefully ignoring, accepting, or even endorsing our own.
Stan,
It is good to hold ourselves accountable to that standard, but I reject it wholeheartedly when used by activists to shut us up.
Well, Stan, you are correct - we are indeed forced to sanction and pay for abortion. Just collectively rather than individually.
Post a Comment