Like Button

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Church and Culture

The church in America has divided largely along two lines. On one side is the liberal, concerned about things like the environment, racial equality, sexism, etc. The other is the conservative side, more involved in matters like abortion, prayer in school, and family values. The problem with these two is that, while each considers themselves the high ground, each is culturally driven, not scripturally driven. They are civil religion. The problem with civil religion is that it tends to be civil, that is, inoffensive. It has no edge because it is politically oriented, not theologically oriented.

Today's church has begun gravitating toward its surrounding culture. Sin and hell are no longer issues. Our culture treats sin as a disease and looks for a cure among the therapists and counselors. Just as our society thrives on consumerism, our churches strive to "give the customer what he wants". We look for worship to be entertaining, for preaching to be interesting, for ministries to be fun. Instead of orienting our lives around a pursuit of God, we fit God in when we can, which is not often. Instead of giving God the serious thought, attention, study, and practice he deserves, we trivialize Him, relegating Him primarily to Sunday mornings. Instead of seeking God's will in our lives, we have become consumers of experiences, looking for that next big thing.

We have turned from a God we must obey to a God we can use. We have turned from a moral emphasis to a relational emphasis. We have no problem believing in a loving God, but avoid the God whose wrath is incurred by sin. We see God as our marketplace, put there for our pleasure.

We have compromised with our society. It's okay to believe as long as it doesn't interfere with life. Being a Christian is acceptable as long as we're not fanatics about it. Religion is a good thing - everyone ought to have it, whatever it might be. So we absorb the lies from television and radio without examining them. We approve divorce and understand "affairs". (From a TV movie, The Anatomy of an Affair: "Single people have affairs. Married people commit adultery.") The biblical standards are mobile, dependent on the circumstances. We have departed from absolute Truth and absolute Right and Wrong and have adhered to relativism. We look to the church for psychological wholeness, not personal holiness. We have committed spiritual adultery, marrying our world while calling ourselves the Bride of Christ. About that, James says, "Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God." (James 4:4) In God's eyes, there is no room for compromise. David Wells puts it this way:
The fact is, of course, that the New Testament never promises anyone a life of psychological wholeness or offers a guarantee of the consumer's satisfaction with Christ. To the contrary, it offers the prospect of indignities, loss, damage, disease, and pain. The faithful in Scripture were scorned, beaten, imprisoned, shipwrecked, and executed. The gospel offers no promises that contemporary believers will be spared these experiences, that they will be able to settle down to the sanitized comfort of an inner life freed of stresses, pains, and ambiguities; it simply promises that through Christ, God will walk with us in all the dark places of life, that he has the power and the will to invest his promises with reality, and that even the shadows are made to serve his glory and our best interests. A therapeutic culture will be inclined to view such promises as something of a disappointment; those who understand that reality is at heart moral because God is centrally holy will be satisfied that this is all they need to know. (David F. Wells, God in the Wasteland, pp. 114-115. (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1994))

4 comments:

Danny Wright said...

I've been thinking about the whole conspieracy thing since writing my post. In wondering how these conspiracies are propagted I stumbled onto a thought that they are self propagting. (I don't know, what do you think) So what does that have to do with this post. Well, as I was reading it, I couldn't help but notice that you used the word we, and correctly so to a degree as far as I'm concerned. But I couldn't help but wonder if there were people who shunned this "new" christianity, and if so, where are they? Wouldn't God's people be drawn to a challenging life if they saw it, especially now as things grow ever darker? And wouldn't such a movement be-in a way-self propagating? There are no shortage of people who complain, Lord knows I'm one of the loudest, but I honestly don't really know anyone who actually suffers for, or because of, his faith. Just a thought.

Stan said...

Well, bottom line, there is a conspiracy by Satan to deceive. We've fallen for it in so many ways that we don't even see some of it anymore. I suspect if we found all those and actually stood away from those deceits, we'd see a lot more suffering.

Marshal Art said...

"People what have you done,
Locked Him in His golden cage?
Made Him bend to your religion
Him resurrected from the grave."

-Ian Anderson

I deal with liberal Christians a great deal and there is a sense of picking and choosing. In addition, Bill Hybels' Willow Creek Congregation put on big shows in order to put butts in the pews, figuring whatever it takes to get them there is a good thing.

Too many leave churches (or find them) because they say it doesn't relate to their lives. I tell them that they are supposed to relate to God. A tough job, but worth it. The best part is with Christ we don't have to be perfect at it. Yet, for some it's not enough. They want to change or eliminate those tricky parts.

Sherry said...

Good post, Stan.

This statement of yours is probably going to really stick with some of us readers: "We have committed spiritual adultery, marrying our world while calling ourselves the Bride of Christ."