Odd. Somehow, somewhere along the way, certain items became taboo in the Church. First is the mind. The popular Church has grown largely anti-intellectual. "Think not" would be their cry, it seems. Oh, they do it with words from the Bible. "Lean not on your own understanding," they say, "which means you're not supposed to use your brain." "We walk by faith, not by sight," they say, "and everyone knows that 'sight' refers to 'logic'." There is a rampant distrust of learning, scholars, higher education, or "too much thinking." I'm sure most of us have heard the phrase "too heavenly minded to be any earthly good." That's the concept.
With the ejection of the mind comes the castigation of tradition. Now, the Roman Catholic Church regards tradition as equal to (or perhaps higher than) Scripture in authority, but Protestants have rejected tradition wholesale. With it goes Church History and anything else that smacks of "that was then." I was stunned, for instance, to read at Monday Morning Insight that the author was delighted that people who liked traditional church were completely repelled by his church, as if "traditional" was evil and "new" was good. Perhaps it's a late date backlash to Roman Catholicism's view of tradition as authoritative, but it's amazingly pervasive in the non-Catholic churches today.
There are more, mostly accompanying these two big ones, but these two are particularly disturbing to me. They are disturbing because they stand in stark disagreement with the Bible. On the use of the mind, for instance, the Bible is not vague. It is part of the Great Commandment: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind" (Matt. 22:37). How, then, are we required to neglect the mind? After 11 masterful chapters from Paul on Christian doctrine to the Romans, he concludes that we should, in response, offer our bodies as a sacrifice to God. The first step in this process, he tells us, is "the renewing of the mind" (Rom. 12:2). How then are we to neglect the mind? Over and over Scripture calls for us to change how we think. God Himself offers to reason with us (Isa. 1:18). How, then, are we to neglect the mind?
As for tradition, despite the Roman Catholic over-stating of its importance, the Protestant removal of tradition is not a biblical position. While Scripture condemns "traditions of men" which clearly countermand biblical teachings, Paul says, "Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep aloof from every brother who leads an unruly life and not according to the tradition which you received from us" (2 Thess. 3:6). It is not, then, "tradition" that is the problem, but the source of that tradition.
We are living in a post-modern society that holds to relativity. This relativity holds that there is no truth. Instead, what you feel is important. And, following with that, much of the Church has rejected thinking in favor of personal enlightenment. And while our American society worships youth and rejects tradition, it appears that, again, the Church is following closely with the world's perspective. Is it a good idea to reject thinking and tradition? Ask the older generation. You see, the Bible teaches that we get wise teaching from them. Maybe we should listen?
2 comments:
Modern day scripture would back up your conclusion.
The glory of God is intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth.
Light and truth forsake that evil one. Doctrine and Covenants 93:36,37
Whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the resurrection. And if a person gains more knowledge and intelligence in this life through his diligence and obedience than another, he will have so much the advantage in the world to come. There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated— And when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated.
Doctrine and Covenants 130:18-21
I've been studying recently on Bible.org, just some tidbits of interest in regarding anti-intellectualism, post-modernism and relativism...
"We live in what may be the most anti-intellectual period in the history of Western civilization... We must have passion - indeed hears on fire for the things of God. But that passion must resist with intensity the anti-intellectual spirit of the world" - R.C. Sproul
"Christians today cannot work with the same assumptions that we did just 20 years ago. At that time, people would join you in your search for absolute truth. It is different now. Today, before we begin to lead people to the truth of Jesus Christ, we may have to lead them to the truth of truth. Common ground must be created before the Gospel can be proclaimed." - Charles Colson
Apologetically, the question which arises in the postmodern context is the following. How can Christianity's claims to truth be taken seriously, when there are so many rival alternatives, and when 'truth' itself has become a devalued notion? No-one can lay claim to possession of truth. It is all a question of perspective. The conclusion of this line of thought is as simple as it is devastating: 'the truth is that there is no truth.' - Alister McGrath
CONVERSATION BETWEEN PROTAGORAS AND SOCRATES (4TH BC):
Protagoras: Truth is relative. It is only a matter of opinion.
Socrates: You mean that truth is mere subjective opinion?
Protagoras: Exactly. What is true for you is true for you, and what is true for me is true for me. Truth is subjective.
Socrates: Do you really mean that? That my opinion is true by virtue of its being my opinion?
Protagoras: Indeed I do.
Socrates: My opinion is: Truth is absolute, not opinion, and that you, Mr. Protagoras, are absolutely in error. Since this is my opinion, you must grant that it is true according to your philosophy.
Protagoras: You are quite correct, Socrates.
PREMODERN: "There's balls and there's strikes and I call them as they are."
MODERN: "There's balls and there's strikes and I call them as I see them."
POSTMODERN: 'They ain't nothing 'til I call 'em."
"In Postmodernism, ther is no objective universal truth; there is only the perspective of the group... In Postmodernism, all viewpoints, all lifestyles, all beliefs and behaviors are regarded as equally valid... Tolerance has become so important that no exception is tolerated." - Charles Colson
Where the Modernist considers FACTS the Postmodernist considers FAIRNESS...
Where the Modernist considers RATIONALITY the Postmodernist considers RELATIONSHIPS...
And where the Modernist considers EVIDENCE the Postmodernist considers EMOTION
MODERN VIEW OF TRUTH: Truth is an objective reality that exists whether someone believes it or not, and that objective reality is grounded in nature. A cannot equal -A at the same time and in the same relationship. Motto: Man can and will know all truth.
POSTMODERN VIEW OF TRUTH: Truth is a perspective reality that exists in the perspective of the individual or group, and that perspective reality is grounded in time. A can equal -A at the same time and in the same relationship. Motto: The truth cannot be known.
THE BIBLICAL VIEW OF TRUTH: Truth is an objective reality that exists whether someone believes it or not, and that objective reality is grounded in and eternal God. A cannot equal -A... Motto: The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our sons forever, that we may observe all the words of this law. (Deu 29:29)
A lot of stuff and nothing new or surprising to you I'm sure... just thought you might enjoy reading them.
Post a Comment