One of the challenges in reading older Christian writers, and even the Bible itself, is that many familiar words no longer mean what they once did. We assume we're understanding a statement because we recognize the words, but often we're importing modern definitions into ideas that were built on very different assumptions.
Take the statement, "Jesus is the friend of sinners" (Matt 11:19; Luke 7:34). Today, a friend is often understood as someone who embraces, affirms, and supports us no matter what we do. Historically, however, a friend was someone committed to our good, even when that required correction, warning, or uncomfortable truth. Scripture says, "Faithful are the wounds of a friend" (Pro 27:6). A true friend was not merely agreeable. He was loyal enough to seek what was best for us. Under that definition, Jesus being the friend of sinners does not mean He affirmed their sin. It means He sought their good.
Or consider the phrase, "There is power in the name of Jesus." Peter healed a crippled man "in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth" (Acts 3:6), and believers are told to do everything "in the name of the Lord Jesus" (Col 3:17). Modern ears sometimes hear this as though power resides in the pronunciation of a particular word or in the repetition of a formula. In Scripture, however, a person's name often represents his character, authority, and identity. David came against Goliath "in the name of the LORD" (1 Sam 17:45), meaning under God's authority and as God's representative. The power is not in the letters J-E-S-U-S. The power is in the Person whom that name represents.
The statement, "God loves you," suffers from a similar problem. Love today is commonly understood as a warm feeling of affection arising from the attractiveness of its object. Yet Scripture says God demonstrated His love for us "while we were still sinners" (Rom 5:8) and loved us even when we were "dead in trespasses and sins" (Eph 2:1-5). Biblical love is not primarily a reaction to loveliness. It is a commitment to seek another's good. God's love was not caused by our worthiness. It is displayed in His determination to redeem the unworthy.
Many other biblical expressions are affected by the same kind of drift. "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom" (Pro 9:10) sounds to modern ears like terror or dread, but throughout Scripture it carries the idea of reverence, awe, and humble submission before God. Likewise, when Paul tells the Philippian jailer, "Believe in the Lord Jesus" (Acts 16:31), he is not merely asking for intellectual agreement. The biblical idea includes trust, reliance, and allegiance.
The word "repent" has undergone a similar shift. Today it is often reduced to feeling sorry for wrongdoing. Yet when Jesus began His public ministry by saying, "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" (Matt 4:17), He was calling people not merely to regret but to turn. Repentance is a change of mind that produces a change of direction.
Even words that seem straightforward have changed in meaning. Biblical "hope" is not wishful thinking. Paul speaks of "the hope laid up for you in heaven" (Col 1:5), and the author of Hebrews describes hope as "a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul" (Heb 6:19). Biblical hope is not uncertainty but confident expectation based on God's promises.
The same is true of the "heart." Modern people think of the heart primarily as the seat of emotion. Yet Scripture speaks of believing with the heart (Rom 10:10), reasoning in the heart (Mark 2:6-8), and storing truth in the heart (Psa 119:11). For biblical writers, the heart referred to the inner person as a whole, including mind, will, desires, and affections.
The Beatitudes provide another example. "Blessed are the meek" (Matt 5:5) can sound to modern readers like "Blessed are the timid" or "Blessed are the weak." Yet Moses, one of the strongest leaders in Scripture, is described as very meek (Num 12:3). Historically, meekness was understood as strength under control, power submitted to God rather than used for self-exaltation.
Perhaps nowhere is the confusion greater than with the idea of judgment. When many people hear Jesus say, "Judge not, that you be not judged" (Matt 7:1), they assume He prohibited moral evaluation altogether. Yet only a few verses later He instructs His followers to recognize false prophets by their fruits (Matt 7:15-20). Elsewhere He says, "Judge with righteous judgment" (John 7:24). The prohibition was not against discernment but against hypocritical and self-righteous condemnation.
What makes all of this important is that many of these older meanings were rooted in objective realities, duties, character, authority, and acts of the will. Modern usage often shifts the focus toward feelings, preferences, affirmation, and subjective experience. As a result, we can read a sentence written two hundred years ago, or two thousand years ago, and completely misunderstand it while thinking we understand it perfectly.
Sometimes the hardest part of understanding an old text is not translating the language. It is translating the meanings that the words once carried. We think we are disagreeing with what earlier Christians believed when often we are only disagreeing with meanings they never intended in the first place. Before rejecting an old doctrine, it is worth asking whether the doctrine has changed at all, or whether the words through which we hear it have simply drifted away from the meanings they once bore.
No comments:
Post a Comment