The topic of false teachers is all over the New Testament. Jesus was the first. He famously described them as wolves in sheep's clothing (Matt 7:15) and told us you could tell them from the true teachers by their fruit (Matt 7:16-20). That was just the start. He said they would appear and "perform great signs and wonders" (Matt 24:24). Paul warned the Ephesians that "savage wolves will come in among you" (Acts 20:28-30). John wrote about "antichrists" (plural) who "went out from us, but they were not really of us" (1 John 2:18-19). So false teachers existed then and exist now. A repeated theme in these warnings is that they come from within, not from without. They are among us and they look a lot like we do.
This is a problem. It is a problem today. If they "look like us", how do we figure out who they are? That would be kind of important. Well, Jesus told us to inspect their fruit. "You will recognize them by their fruits," He said (Matt 7:20). So what does that look like? One fruit is what John indicated. Are they going "out from us"? Are they deviating? Are they living lives that contradict Scripture? A popular version of "false teacher" today is the health-and-wealth teacher. These live obvious lives of greed which Scripture refers to as "idolatry" (Col 3:5). Deviation. One preacher preached against sexual immorality, it seemed, in every sermon, but was caught with a prostitute. Deviation. Then there is the question of doctrine. Look, if Jesus was right and the Holy Spirit has led His people into truth (John 16:13) and if Jude was right and there is, indeed, a faith "once for all handed down to the saints" (Jude 1:3), then we shouldn't be seeing much that is new. Adjusted? Maybe. More fully understood? Perhaps. But not new. So when, for instance, the Church for 2,000 years held that marriage was between a man and a woman because that's what the Bible teaches and someone comes in with a brand new understanding that directly contradicts that understanding, you're likely looking at a false teacher. Just an easy example. If believers from the beginning understood Scripture to teach that homosexual behavior was a sin and someone waltzes in to explain that, "no, everyone for the last 2,000 years has misunderstood that and it actually doesn't teach that at all," you're looking at a deviation. If Scripture clearly teaches that Christ saved us by His blood and you have teachers telling you "It ain't so," you're looking at a false teacher. John wrote, "We are from God. Whoever knows God listens to us; whoever is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error" (1 John 4:6). One other test is the gospel. Scripture is clear about the gospel -- saved by grace through faith through the death and resurrection of Jesus and apart from works. If an angel from heaven preaches a gospel contrary to that, Paul says, "let him be accursed" (Gal 1:8-9).
False teachers have always been around. We have been, in fact, warned by our Savior Himself that they're going to be around. We need to be vigilant. We need to watch how they behave. We need to see if they are teaching true doctrine (as opposed to, say, the pastor that assured us that there was no such thing as hell). We need to see if they submit themselves to Scripture or simply overlay their own somewhat contrary version. And we need to see if they agree with the biblical version of the gospel. It needs to be a constant watch. We need to be in constant prayer. The consequences of failure to detect them can be dire (2 Peter 2:2), even the risk of misleading the elect (Matt 24:24). Be alert. We need more lerts. (Sorry; bad joke there at the end.)
7 comments:
Too often we accept changes to the Biblical teaching because we feel the pressure of the changing times around us. But we can only adapt the Bible to our changing world if Christianity is just another man-made religion. If the Church has been wrong about it for 2000 years and new ideas need to be added or detract, Christianity is no more valid than any other religion.
What is the bar for a false teacher? Not in terms of what teach8ngs cross the line, but what constitutes a teacher. Is some random guy on the internet a teacher? Or does it require intent, or someone who is being taught?
False teachers abound. Now, I think, biblically, they have to claim to be Christians. I mean, your Internet Satanist is a false teacher, but these false teachers are the ones that could be mistaken for true.
Stan,
I agree that they abound, and that they have to claim to be Christian. But does someone have to be in a position of claiming (or being) a pastor or teacher? For example John Shuck is clearly a false teacher, who has been allowed by the PCUSA and various congregations to promulgate his false teachings under their brand. But what about the guy on the internet who isn't in a pulpit, or a seminary, but still presents themselves as someone who is presenting Christianity in an accurate way?
Or, what about us? Are we teachers?
David,
Excellent point. We live in a society that doesn't value fidelity to anything over long periods of time. We see this in our attitudes to marriage, politics, and definitely Christianity. We've also abandoned any notion of any sort of transcendent, objective, Truth as being something to be valued.
Generally speaking, I think of a teacher as someone who is doing the job/task of teaching. As opposed to, say, a person walking down the street who, by being observed, could be teaching something to someone without intending to. I'm not sure the venue defines it. Someone on the Internet who is using the Internet as a teaching platform would qualify, I'd think. But I think the warnings from Scripture suggest we need to be looking anywhere at all for people who qualify as false teachers.
Gotcha, I think that the internet has given a lot of people a platform to teach all sorts of stuff without the check and balance of having a congregation or a governing body to correct them. That's why I think I'd define it more broadly than a pastor/teacher role in a church.
Post a Comment