Like Button

Monday, March 30, 2015

The Way

Before Christians were called Christians, they were called followers of "the Way" (Acts 9:2). (They were first called Christians in Antioch in Acts 11:26.)

Followers of the Way. Interesting concept. The truth is both "Christian" and "followers of the Way" end up being the same thing. Why? Well, as every believer knows, it was Jesus who said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." (John 14:6) So if Christ is the Way, we are both Christians and followers of the Way. It sounds ... harmless enough. As it turns out, it really seemed to upset people back then (In that Acts 9 verse, the followers of the Way were being arrested and imprisoned.) and still does today. Why?

I can think of two obvious reasons that the whole thing upsets people. The first and foremost is the concept of exclusivity. In our society the atmosphere is one of inclusion. "We will include anyone and everything ... except, of course, Christians. They're not welcome." So when Christianity (most religions, in fact, but no one seems to notice) comes along and says, "There is only one Way," we're in trouble. "Just one? Sounds arrogant." And I would admit that at first blush it does. But remember, it's not our claim. It's Christ's. We didn't conjure up this "secret club" that excludes others and claims the sole truth. Christ did. You may squirm a bit when you say, "Jesus is the only way" and people are outraged with you, but if you are a follower of Christ, you have no other option.

And, look, the fact is that it's not merely required as a follower of Christ; it's reasonable. What the rest of the world would like to tell you is "All roads lead to Rome." But if Jesus was right and He is the Way--that "No man comes to the Father but through Me"--then it only follows that other roads lead elsewhere. If it is not true that Jesus is the only Way, then Christianity itself is false and is not only not the only way, it is no way. Logic dictates it. So while we can sympathize with the apparent arrogance of the claim of exclusivity, if we are to remain true to Christ and logic, we have to stand by it.

The other difficulty for people is Jesus's other claim on the subject.
"Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few. (Matt 7:13-14)
I don't know about you, but to me that's a tough statement. Look at what our Savior is saying in terms of numbers. First, we get that He is the narrow gate. But in terms of numbers, "many" miss it and "few" find it. These are not happy terms. In a poll at the turn of the century something like 76% of Americans classified themselves as Christians. Now, as it turned out, only 15% of them went to church and only 5% said that it made any difference in their lives. That should serve as a warning flag, a red light, an alert klaxon. Jesus's terminology does not support the 76%, but does tend toward the 5%. And, frankly, that's disturbing. According to Jesus our churches are largely occupied by tares, not wheat (Matt 13:18-30). They bear a lot of resemblance to each other, but one is a weed to be stripped out and burned at the end. So not only are the unbelievers outside the doors; they're inside.

Well, now, that just won't do. You can't be questioning people's salvation. It's not done. They claim to be Christians and so they are. Don't assume otherwise. Except that when we examine fruit (Jesus's idea, not mine (Matt 7:16-20)) and we ask questions (the primary point of 1 John) and we look at things like whether people love the brethren (John 13:35), it gets really dicey. And if we are sitting in the midst of people who call themselves Christians but are, indeed, tares among wheat destined for the fires of Hell, is it kind and loving to say nothing?

Well, of course, this will never do. It is this whole exclusivity thing and its accompanying claim of not only being exclusive but narrow that upsets people. And yet, we are followers of Christ, the one who claimed to be the exclusive Way, the one who said the gate was narrow and the way was hard and few would find it. So, look, we have a very simple choice here. Will we ease up and ignore Christ, or will we grit our teeth and follow Him? You ought to decide now. It will make a difference in where you go from there.

5 comments:

Naum said...

In John 14:6, Jesus 1st presents himself as a *Way* (i.e, means, practice, lifestyle), 2nd he becomes our experienced *Truth* (for me and through me), which is 3rd, then the one great *Life* (for me and for the world). It's a travesty that this verse has been used to preach intolerant and exclusive versions of Christianity. What Jesus is saying is that is if Jesus is "the way, the truth, and the life", then you and I are not. Nor are our groups. All our pretenses are undermined.

Jesus truth claim was his person. Jesus give us his risen presence as "the way, the truth, and the life". No dogma can ever supplant that.

Naum said...

In Matthew 7:14, Jesus is talking about life in this world -- that we know innately, intimacy with God (or anything, for that matter) is going to change us. But the ego hates, more than anything, to change. But if we continue to pray, it will change our priorities, our worldview, our preferences. It will be a *new* world, but the ego prefers to hunker down in the old one.

Stan said...

I'm fascinated, Naum, that you can claim that it's a travesty that when Jesus claimed "No man comes to the Father but by me" that followers of Christ would claim that no man comes to the Father but by Him. But I suppose you have your good reasons for your assertion.

I'd be glad to respond to your representation of Matt 7:14 if I had a clue what you meant. Jesus speaks of a narrow gate and a wide gate. The narrow gate leads to life and the wide gate leads to destruction. The wide gate is easy to find and the narrow gate is difficult and few find it. From this you conclude it's a reference to the necessary discard of remaining where you are and the obviously better world of "change". Whether I agree or not with your assertion that it's bad to be conservative (wishing to conserve what is good and avoid changing to what is bad), I cannot for the life of me find a connection in the text you reference.

That is, in both your assertions--Christians who believe that Jesus claimed to be the only way are evil, and "the narrow way" is a reference to becoming a liberal as opposed to being a conservative--I'm missing your connection with the texts or contexts you're offering. Please pardon my lack of depth that you seem to own.

Naum said...

@Stan wrote: I'm fascinated, Naum, that you can claim that it's a travesty that when Jesus claimed "No man comes to the Father but by me" that followers of Christ would claim that no man comes to the Father but by Him. But I suppose you have your good reasons for your assertion.

That's not what I wrote Stan, and that is a harshly uncharitable way to paraphrase.

In no way did I say that it's a travesty that Jesus said "no one comes to the Father but by me" -- that is Jesus saying that he and the Father are the same.

What I pushback against is the exclusionary reading of these passages which goes against Jesus words & deeds in the Gospel (and throughout the NT).

Jesus is the truth. We are not. But many read these passages and instead, construct themselves into those whose "lord over", instead of inviting and sitting and breaking bread at the table. :(

Stan said...

The statement by Jesus is an exclusionary statement. "No man comes to the Father but by Me." You are saying, "No, it isn't." Forgive me if that is an uncharitable way to say it. I didn't say you deny Jesus said it. I said you deny it means "No man comes to the Father but by Me." You say, "I pushback against is the exclusionary reading of these passages which goes against Jesus words." I don't see how I'm misrepresenting what you are arguing.

Besides that, you're not offering an alternative. If we are saved by grace through faith in Christ, what "inclusive" manner are you suggesting that is not by grace through faith in Christ?