To tell the truth, I’m somewhat torn on the question of illegal immigration.
First (first not in order of priority, but the most obvious), I believe that a nation has the right to defend/control its borders. It seems to me that only socialism would argue this point. Unless we are required somehow to share all that we have with the world, it seems obvious that we Americans have the right to determine who comes into this country and who does not. As far as I know, every other country controls who comes in and who doesn’t. Isn’t the United States afforded the same right?
And in that vein, why are we required to pay for all the benefits of living in America for those who are here illegally? As an example, we are currently facing a serious health crisis in our hospitals because the federal government has mandated that emergency rooms must treat anyone who comes to them regardless of their immigration status or ability to pay. As a result, many immigrants have used the emergency rooms of America as primary care facilities, foisting off all payment to someone else. The government has tried to work on this problem by passing Medicare legislation that allows reimbursement to hospitals for the treatment of these cases, but it isn’t working. From 1995 to 2000, for instance, 23 hospitals closed in California alone, citing primarily financial difficulties brought on by non-payment for care in emergency rooms. From 2001 to 2004, another 25 California hospitals closed, again due to financial difficulties. In Arizona, there is only one trauma center available for the entire southern portion of the state, located in Tucson. Why? It’s because of the proximity of the border and the nearly constant flow of illegal aliens through the emergency rooms. Maintaining a trauma center is just becoming too costly for many hospitals.
But emergency rooms are only part of the problem. It is reported that illegal immigration currently costs Arizonans $1.3 billion for emergency medical care, education and incarceration. Californians pay $10.5 billion, and Texans pay another $4.6 billion. Nationally, it is estimated that illegal immigrants are paid $75 billion in welfare per year. Other costs amount to anywhere between $30 billion to $50 billion a year. Beyond the financial impact, 29% of inmates in federal prisons are in this country illegally, and studies suggest that cities with a higher influx of illegal immigrants suffer from twice the violent crime rate of those with lower influx.
Counting this cost, I feel the ire rising over this assault on our nation’s borders. I want to march, to campaign, to join the Minutemen or shake Washington out of its lethargy. This is wrong. It’s not fair; it’s not right.
But there is another side to it. I’m a Christian. Christians are supposed to care for the poor. We are supposed to give to the needy. We are supposed to be the compassionate ones. Who is it that is invading our country? It’s the poorest of the poor, the low-skilled, the native poor, desperately seeking something beyond starving to death. I’ve known some of these illegal aliens. They aren’t here to break the law; they’re here to make ends meet. They are sending money back home so mom and pop don’t starve. They are working two and three jobs, living in crowded conditions, trying their best to just get by because in their countries they weren’t. How can a compassionate Christian complain about the cost? How do I manage my American outrage and my Christian concern? How can I, a follower of Christ, suggest turning away a poor family seeking medical attention for their little baby? Is it just to turn people away because they're not Americans?
So, I’m torn. How do I correlate my beliefs as an American with my beliefs as a Christian? Many will toss one for the other. I don’t think I have to do that. Where is the center line? Where is the balance? I haven’t quite found that spot yet, so you won’t likely find me on the border with the Minutemen or marching with the illegal aliens anytime soon.
5 comments:
I understand what you're saying, but I still have this "catch" that prevents me from agreeing wholeheartedly.
"Because Americans are blessed with more, are we not required to give all that we have, with a joyful heart?"
Actually, no. It might be argued that because we American Christians are blessed with more, we are required to give more, but that doesn't translate to all Americans. We believers have a higher call, a different standard, and a different means ("Christ in you") to meet that higher call, that different standard.
So I have no problem suggesting that Christians need to be more compassionate. I have a big problem, however, suggesting that all Americans are "required to give all that we have". That's nothing more than pure, unadulterated Socialism, and, I believe, a violation of Scripture, since what we give is supposed to be voluntary, not mandated.
Many libertarians also think we have no right to have borders.
If you think allowing illegal immigration is compassionate, start doing research on all the effects. For instance, is it compassionate to allow a foreign government to avoid reforms by sending us the people they won't take care of? Is it compassionate to deprive Mexico of the workers they need? Is it compassionate to encourage political corruption in the U.S.?
An introduction to the subject
Samantha,
I'm not looking at it from a "Is it fair to me?" perspective. I'm looking at it from a "Do I have the right to demand that all Americans operate from my perspective?" perspective.
On the other hand, I'm looking at it from a personal perspective as well. Does God require that I ... be a socialist personally? Are Christians required to give up all worldly goods and turn them over to whomever needs them? Is that the Christian requirement? If it is, we need to get on it because we're not. In other words, WE'RE IN SIN. If it is not, then how much am I required to give up for illegal immigrants? That is, what is my obligation?
So I'm not sure from two directions.
Anonymous,
So there is no need/room for compassion among Christians for the individual suffering of people who come to this country, legally or illegally?
Samantha,
You said, "Just so you know, I not smart in these topics whatsoever."
I suppose if I were smart enough on these topics it wouldn't be such a question to me, would it? Other people don't seem to have any questions.
I appreciate your input and cannot imagine anything said here that would require an apology. =)
I empathize with your struggles on this issue Stan. Honestly, you would find me on the border with the Minutemen before you would find me on the other extreme (whatever that might be). Given that I am far removed from the direct effects border security - I can't imagine how much more polarize on the issue I might feel if I lived in the southwest.
As for the Christian response. I personally am against sending millions of illegals back across the border just to tell them to come back in legally. In my view, we've looked the other way too long, failing to enforce our own laws - so to suddenly prosecute them and create a potential human crisis would in my opinion be less than Christian.
Lastly, I'm all for border security. For me, it's not a commentary on who we are (or aren't) or how we feel (or don't) - but our simple admission that there are loads of folks that are perfectly able and willing to take full advantage of the openness that our many freedoms provide. To be Christian does not mean to put yourself in a situation where you are constantly taken advantage of. I have doors, locks and a security system on my Christian home - why not have the same for our country?
Post a Comment