I can hardly stomach the political ads and the nonsense that is classified "political speech" these days. Most of it is nonsense. "Don't vote for my opponent; he/she is a jerk." Practically nothing about why I should vote for you. Just all the reasons I shouldn't vote against you. Oddly, your opponent told me the same thing about you! Years ago I read this absolutely marvelous All-Occasion Non-Slanderous Political Smear Speech. Loved it. Turns out it's still available! So here it is for your enjoyment.
Guaranteed Effective All-Occasion Non-Slanderous Political Smear Speech
By Bill Garvin
MAD #139, December 1970
My fellow citizens, it is an honor and a pleasure to be here today. My opponent has openly admitted he feels an affinity toward your city, but I happen to like this area. It might be a salubrious place to him, but to me it is one of the nation's most delightful garden spots.
When I embarked upon this political campaign I hoped that it could be conducted on a high level and that my opponent would be willing to stick to the issues. Unfortunately, he has decided to be tractable instead -- to indulge in unequivocal language, to eschew the use of outright lies in his speeches, and even to make repeated veracious statements about me.
At first, I tried to ignore these scrupulous, unvarnished fidelities. Now I do so no longer. If my opponent wants a fight, he's going to get one!
It might be instructive to start with his background. My friends, have you ever accidentally dislodged a rock on the ground and seen what was underneath? Well, exploring my opponent's background is dissimilar. All the slime and filth and corruption you could possibly imagine, even in your wildest dreams, are glaringly nonexistent in this man's life. And even during his childhood!
Let us take a very quick look at that childhood: It is a known fact that, on a number of occasions, he emulated older boys at a certain playground. It is also known that his parents not only permitted him to masticate excessively in their presence, but even urged him to do so. Most explicable of all, this man who poses as a paragon of virtue, exacerbated his own sister while they were both teenagers!
I ask you, my fellow Americans: Is this the kind of person we want in public office to set an example for our youth? Of course, it's not surprising that he should have such a typically pristine background -- no, not when you consider the other members of his family:
* His female relatives put on a constant pose of purity and innocence, and claim they are inscrutable, yet every one of them has taken part in hortatory activities.
* The men in the family are likewise completely amenable to moral suasion.
* His second cousin is an admitted Mormon.
* His uncle was a flagrant heterosexual.
* His sister, who has always been obsessed by sects, once worked as a proselyte ... outside a church!
* His father was secretly chagrined at least a dozen times by matters of a pecuniary nature.
* His youngest brother wrote an essay extolling the virtues of being a homosapien.
* His great-aunt expired from a degenerative disease.
* His nephew subscribes to a phonographic magazine.
* His wife was a thespian before their marriage and even performed the act in front of paying customers!
* And his own mother had to resign from a women's organization in her later years because she was an admitted sexagenarian.
Now what shall we say of the man himself?
I can tell you in solemn truth that he is the very antithesis of political radicalism, economic irresponsibility, and personal depravity. His own record proves that he has frequently discountenanced treasonable, un-American philosophies and has perpetrated many overt acts as well.
* He perambulated his infant son on the street.
* He practiced nepotism with his uncle and first cousin.
* He attempted to interest a 13-year-old girl in philately.
* He has declared himself in favor of more homogeneity on college campuses.
* He has advocated social intercourse in mixed company -- and has taken part in such gatherings himself.
* He has been deliberately averse to crime in our streets.
* He has urged our Protestant and Jewish citizens to develop more catholic tastes.
* Last summer he committed a piscatorial act on a boat that was flying the American flag.
* Finally, at a time when we must be on our guard against all foreign "isms", he has coolly announced his belief in altruism -- and his fervent hope that some day this entire nation will be altruistic!
I beg you, my friends, to oppose this man whose life and work and ideas are so openly and avowedly compatible with our American way of life. A vote for him would be a vote for the perpetuation of everything we hold dear.
The facts are clear; the record speaks for itself.
Do your duty.
8 comments:
It's sad how many heads this would go over today. Even I have to admit ignorance of some of the terms used.
Stan, I am a bit concerned that you are obtaining blog content from Mad Magazine :), but I am glad you did, as I enjoyed this very much!! Fortunately, wordplay is “my thing,” but I still needed that online dictionary a few times. My favorite new word is “hortatory”--I can definitely use that one! After reading all those shocking accusations, I would say that the candidate’s worst offense, in my mind, was developing “more catholic tastes” (if I didn’t know better). Overall, such a glaring amount of non-hate speech! Seriously, though, wouldn’t it be nice if we ever saw candidates anywhere close to this guy?
Lorna, a friend of mine texted me Monday morning with the same (humorous) observation. The truth is I've had that speech in my files for literally decades and didn't realize Mad Magazine was the source until last week. Who knew?
Good chance to look up some new words, eh? Someone once asked me, "I really like that I can point at the references you offer and it pops up and shows me the text. Could you do that with your words?" No, I can't. I can only wish.
Of course you can’t have a dictionary embedded in your posts. However, if a reader highlights a word with his/her mouse and right clicks, they can select “Search Google for [highlighted word.] That way, the definition (and usage information) is brought right up in a new window. I do that constantly when reading your posts!
Indeed, I am wondering if I should be reading Mad Magazine now, as I might really enjoy it. I remember reading them back in the 1960’s when my older brothers were done with their copies, but I usually didn’t understand most of it! (Perhaps that magazine began my love of sardonic humor.) I do recall the clever back covers; we would try to guess the encrypted message before folding it but never could.
In any event, I hope that no one out there is policing blogs for blatant and virulent non-hate speech because your blog would be shut down after that one! :)
It would be interesting to give that speech and see how it goes over. One must sure to do so with the right tone and emotion for the proper effect.
BTW...I filed this speech.
Post a Comment