DEI is all the rage -- diversity, equality, and inclusion. Companies and campuses have entire departments dedicated to promoting and even requiring it. Largely driven from "Black Lives Matter" theology that all whites are racist, the Feminism worldview that all men are sexist, and, of course, the current sexular society that lays the heaviest weight on the demands of less than 10% of society -- the so-called LGBT+ folks -- we don't find pleas for diversity, equality, and inclusion; it's all demands. It's required. It's not a conversation; it's a revolution.
Make no mistake; the battle is engaged. Institutions of higher education have stepped up big time, but corporations aren't far behind. It's no longer about economics for them; it's about "corporate social responsibility." But, oddly enough, it is, in its daily application, fundamentally opposed to diversity, equality, and inclusion. Yes, read that again. All this DEI stuff runs on the principle of not diversifying, equalizing, or including, but the opposite. The way to diversify is to eliminate those who aren't diverse. The way to equalize is not to bring what is lower up, but to bring down that which is higher. The way to include is to exclude those who don't agree. News organizations have stepped up to the DEI program by eliminating diverse thought in their ranks and homing in on a singular vantage point from which to attack those who are not diverse, equal, or inclusive enough on the right issues in their view. The once accepted notion of blind justice and diverse media are headed out the door. Repeatedly over the past 10 years (or more) stories have surfaced (e.g., Russiagate, Hunter's emails, COVID origins) that were intentionally drowned despite the evidence because they didn't fit the required message. The DOJ, the FBI, the mainstream media, etc., have been politically weaponized, grabbing the ear of the public in order to train them what to think. So we get things like rampant antisemitism and "Death to America" rallies in the heart of our American melting pot.
Diversity, equality, and inclusion ... these aren't bad things. I suppose that's part of the problem, the reason why we're confused. They are good things. They are not the problem. The problem is this double standard that says that the way to achieve those good goals is to eliminate opposition. Fine them. Fire them. Bury them. Ruin them. We can't even talk about it. It used to be the rallying cry of the media: "The people have the right to know!" Now it's more like, "The people have the right to know ... what to think!" And, almost biblically, "we, like sheep, have gone astray."
6 comments:
Did you mean to say sexular society?
The problem with DEI is that it is the goal, not a means to an end. They say "diversity is our strength". And we smile and agree because it is true. But to us, the goal of diversity is to make us stronger, to them the goal is diversity, whether or not it makes us stronger. And as you said, it's not diversity, but homogeneity of thought.
I had it pointed out to me that DEI is also the Latin word for God. Some good for thought. To them, DEI is there god.
Yes, I wrote "sexular" society on purpose. Our current mindset in this society places sex at the head of the line. So many of the current, protected immorality is based on sex. That wasn't a typo.
It looked intentional, and I liked it. Apt description of our society.
As you say, diversity, equality, and inclusion are good things in a society, but it is clear that the strongest DEI proponents are not executing their agenda in a manner that is respectful to all--thus alienating many potential supporters. It strikes me that the Church is actually the best model of DEI, as it already embraces and celebrates diversity, equality, and inclusion--as well as tolerance, kindness, open-mindedness, respect, acceptance, and love--which, when expressed within God’s parameters, are what the world needs now more than ever.
Just to clarify: By “the Church” in my comment above, I mean the true, universal followers of Jesus Christ, who comprise His Bride--not the liberal “churches” who actually comply with the worldly DEI agenda.
Post a Comment