Like Button

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Individually

In our current society the key component is "me." It is the individual. That's the basic part that can then be used to configure the other parts -- couples, parents, families, communities, and so on. Makes sense. Or so it seems. So we also assume that's the basic component of Christianity: "me". Because of this notion, we will find plenty of worship love songs that sound a lot like "Jesus is my boyfriend." Because of this idea, we will hear believers saying apparently biblical things like, "Jesus is my Bridegroom." Because of this idea, you find genuine believers who feel no compulsion to be part of a local body of believers. "You and me, Lord. You and me." And I would suggest it's somewhat in error.

In the Old Testament, God chose Abraham to be the father of His chosen people. In a sense, that was the end of the individual (Gen 12:1-3). After that they were "the children of Abraham." A group. Israel was the nation that housed "God's chosen people." a group. The group (obviously) was made up of individuals and God interacted with individuals -- I'm not saying that individuals are not in view -- but it was almost always with a group view. In his epistle to the church at Corinth, Paul writes about believers as being "God's field, God's building" (1 Cor 3:9). When he says, "Do you not know that you are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in you?" (1 Cor 3:16), he is not speaking of "you" as individuals, but "you" plural. The "temple of God" is the community of Christians. We are called the "body of Christ" (1 Cor 12:12, 27), not as individuals but as a group. He says "we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another" (Rom 12:5). Yes, individuals, but not for individuals -- for the body of Christ, the Church. In Ephesians Paul speaks of the elimination of the divide between Jew and Gentile.
But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For He Himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in His flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that He might create in Himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility. (Eph 2:13-16)
"One new man." That's his phrase. That's what Christ has done. Elsewhere in Ephesians he compares marriage to the relationship between Christ and the Church (Eph 5:31-32). Not individuals. Jesus is the Bridegroom to the Bride, but the Bride is the body of believers, not individuals.

Christianity doesn't ignore individuals. We are gifted by the Spirit individually, but as parts of the body of Christ (1 Cor 12:12-27), those gifts are for the body of Christ (1 Cor 12:7; Eph 4:15-16). We are each responsible to follow Christ, but the aim is the building up of the body. We are individual components of the temple of God. We are individuals that, as a cohesive group, make up the Bride of Christ. So individuals are not unimportant, but we are not the focus. Christ is. His body is. His Bride is. To the extent that the individual believer is contributing to Christ, to the body, to the Bride is the basic measure of whether or not he or she is following God's plan. As such, "Jesus is my boyfriend," "I am the Bride of Christ," and "Just You and me, Lord" don't make much sense in a biblical worldview (Eph 5:21; Mark 10:35-45; John 13:35). In the human body, individual cells that are simply pursuing their own path have a designation. They are called "cancer." So if you aren't part of a local group of believers today, why aren't you?

3 comments:

Bob said...

Being part of body and being part of the program are two different things.
church group dynamics today can be a little intimidating. at the first visit; its all loving and excepting. then after a few visits they want you to put you into a group, they feel is right for you. i being a solitary man by nature; tend to make friends with a few brothers at a time. for me it is easier to be closer to a few then it is for me with the larger group.
i do agree that the body should assemble and worship together. its just that things today have gotten more program oriented.
my best times were when i would start the workday with my brother over a hot cup of coffee.
we were so excited about what God was doing in our lives..

Stan said...

I agree that "part of the program" and "part of the body" are not the same. I agree that we need to assemble and worship together. I do want to distinguish between the certainly edifying "cup of coffee with a brother" and being part of the body. One on one is biblical, good, important, all that, but being part of a local body of believers is more and just as necessary. (I don't think you disagreed with that; I just wanted to make it clear because some believers are willing to substitute "I get together with other Christians on my own" for the gathering of believers prescribed by Scripture.)

Bob said...

TOLEDO, WA—During their Sunday morning service, Toledo Gospel Church announced to their 100-member congregation that their Singles Fellowship group would be merging with their Seniors Fellowship. The decision came after church leaders realized the average age in the singles group had reached 58 years.
See what i mean? its getting tough out there to fit in.

yes i do agree that the idea that we can be lone sheep disconnected from the body, is a problem. perhaps this is prevalent because there is no clear and present danger of being singled out and set upon. when persecution comes (and it is coming )we will either join together for mutual support, or fall by the wayside because we were easy pickings.