Did He? Did God divorce Israel? When we consider divorce and the biblical view on the topic, is it true that God Himself is the Grandest Divorcee of all? The assertion comes from Jeremiah.
The LORD said to me in the days of King Josiah: "Have you seen what she did, that faithless one, Israel, how she went up on every high hill and under every green tree, and there played the whore? And I thought, 'After she has done all this she will return to Me,' but she did not return, and her treacherous sister Judah saw it. She saw that for all the adulteries of that faithless one, Israel, I had sent her away with a decree of divorce. Yet her treacherous sister Judah did not fear, but she too went and played the whore" (Jer 3:6-8).Well, look, that's the answer, isn't it? God told Jeremiah regarding Israel "I had sent her away with a decree of divorce." Clear as day! Next question? I mean, it could even be claimed that those who are divorced are more like God than those who are not! Right?
I'd like to point out a couple of problems here. First, the text begins with "'If a man divorces his wife and she goes from him and becomes another man's wife, will he return to her? Would not that land be greatly polluted? You have played the whore with many lovers; and would you return to Me?' declares the LORD" (Jer 3:1). The context of God's statement here is Mosaic Law from Deuteronomy. In Chapter 24 we find instructions on the topic. As it turns out, the instructions are not at all regarding when one can divorce, but about what happens after. If a man divorces his wife, she marries another, and is again divorced, "then her former husband, who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after she has been defiled, for that is an abomination before the LORD" (Deut 24:4). That is, remarrying your wife whom you divorced after she has been remarried and divorced is something that God hates. He affirms that in the first verse of Jeremiah 3. So if God divorced Israel, by what possible means could He reunite with her? I ask, you see, because the rest of Scripture is abundantly clear that He does. Paul wrote, "I ask, then, has God rejected His people? By no means!" (Rom 11:1). We didn't replace Israel; we were grafted into Israel (Rom 11:17-29). If, then, God actually divorced Israel who married then to her other gods, and God then remarries her, God would be guilty Himself of that which He hates.
So, I ask again, did God divorce Israel? And I would argue, "No! He did not." You may say, "Apparently, then, you don't take the Bible literally." And I would argue that I'm taking it as written. Let me explain. First, there is the problem of the apparent contradiction that I've pointed out. In order for God to actually divorce Israel and then return He would need to violate His own nature. Problem! So I look at it again. What else might be going on?
Well, first, there are the clues found in the text. If God is affirming (as He does) that divorced people must not remarry each other (short version), then why does He say what He says? "Go, and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, '"Return, faithless Israel," declares the LORD'" (Jer 3:12). He just said that such a return was ... what was the word ... "pollution". Why would He call for it? You see, the text is not about divorce; it's about repentance.
So what is He saying in verse 8 with that whole "decree of divorce" thing? Well, clearly God is not a man, so clearly God is not married to Israel. Our version of marriage is indeed a picture of Christ's relationship with the Church, but not a precise one. I mean, really, just take a few steps into "marriage" at its most literal and you'll find it's ... problematic. No, it is an image, not the reality. We are made in the image of God, but that doesn't mean we are God. In the same way, marriage is a mystical union and a covenant and all, similar to God's relationship with us, but God is not actually married to Israel nor Christ to the Church. Thus, the "decree of divorce" was not intended as a literal "God divorced Israel" since 1) it would violate His own nature and 2) He was not actually married to Israel. Instead, it was intended as a picture, a metaphor, an image of God's seriousness regarding Israel and Judah and their idolatry. "You don't want to go there," He was saying. "You really do not want to go there."
I can, of course, be mistaken on this point. If you believe I am, you will need to determine how it is that God is able to violate His own commands and disregard His own nature. You'll have to figure out how God (not a man) can marry Israel (not a woman). And you'll have to explain to others, "Just because God did it doesn't give you the right to do it," because that's a very common perception. "God divorced His wife, Israel; I can certainly divorce mine." Using God over against Christ (Matt 19:4-6) like that is very dangerous. So it is your call. But I would argue that God was using imagery that we can understand to warn His people against vile sin and not actually doing that which would violate His own nature and make Himself irrational. That would be my view. God is not the Grand Divorcee.
4 comments:
Well, the sin is not the divorce. The sin is what causes the divorce, which is all Israel.
Literally, the Bible talks about divorcing -- remarrying -- divorcing -- remarrying the first spouse as the abomination.
When Israel was scattered, it was impossible for her to remarry after her divorce because she was not corporately together, she was scattered. She committed adultery through idolatry.
The major key here is that divorce was allowed because of the hardness of hearts of man. God's heart is tender and ready to forgive the repentant child. He is also ready to woo and take back Israel. There is no sin if the first spouse never married again. Ezekiel describes it in 16:15-34.
Hosea illustrates it in that Gomer did not marry again, but went back to her old way of prostitution. This is why Hosea could marry her again after he had divorced her.
Isaiah tells us that God separated from Israel first, that rain did not come and it was a dry land, but Israel did not turn back. Then in Jeremiah is the divorce decree from the marriage covenant found in Deuteronomy, and Israel is scattered and she is inter-mingled with other nations with only God knowing who is Israeli and who is of mixed blood.
<a href="http://refreshmentrefuge.blogspot.com/2010/12/god-woos-his-wife-israel.html> God woos Israel</a>
Engraved in His palm,
Gina :)
I'm confused, then.
First, I don't understand the premise. In what way does a Deity actually marry a nation? Actually marry? I can understand if it is figuratively a marriage, but then the divorce would also be figurative (which was my point).
Second, if God begins His message to Israel with a warning that remarriage is pollution, knowing that such a possibility did not exist in this situation, what was the point? Why bring it up? It didn't matter. It couldn't and wouldn't happen. Why mention it?
And, of course, there's the whole practical question of this reality. Who performed this marriage? Who witnessed it? In what (literal) sense (since you're positing a literal marriage) was this marriage consummated? And since it is a literal marriage, it is a literal divorce. Where was the certificate of divorce filed? When did Israel receive it? Where is it on record? Requiring an actual marriage and actual divorce causes all sorts of problems.
Of course, at the end, I'm still finding God in contention with God. Jesus opposed divorce, but God argued for it. Jesus said that divorce was only allowed for hardness of heart, but God did it. And it is undeniable that among divorcees God would be the ultimate divorcee -- the Grand Divorcee.
If this marriage and consequent divorce is literal and actual, it just doesn't work in my head biblically or logically.
Based on this, the description of God "marrying and divorcing" Israel would be another anthropomorphization of God. God didn't literally marry Israel. That would be akin to a woman marrying the Eiffel Tower. God is spirit, Israel is a nation of people. Two completely different entities.
David, exactly (part of) my problem with the literal "God divorced Israel" concept. Well put.
Post a Comment