Sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these" (Gal 5:19-21).Clearly, sexual immorality leads the list, but the rest are far broader. Thinks like "enmity" and "fits of anger" and "envy." Or, "everyday things." Things we all deal with. If you are a human being living in this world, you deal with these issues. If you are a Christian living in this world, you deal with these issues and are concerned about it. What's a believer to do?
Paul makes this straightforward, unambiguous statement:
"I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh" (Gal 5:16).Assuming that the Bible is "God-breathed", accurate, even authoritative, then we can assume that those who walk by the Spirit will not gratify the desires of the flesh. (They don't call me "Captain Obvious" for nothing.) Notice, however, the reverse conclusion. If we are gratifying the desires of the flesh -- if Christians are sinning -- what can we tell about our current mode of operation? If the statement is true, at that moment we can conclude that we are not walking by the Spirit.
Any genuine follower of Christ will be appalled at sin. Often we are appalled after the sin, but there is, built into every believer, the "seed of God" (1 John 3:9) and we may (will) sin, but we won't be happy about it. So we look for solutions. We read self-help books on how to be better and we seek biblical advice and we pray and we look for accountability partners and all sorts of nifty ideas. These aren't bad ideas, but the Bible suggests that there is an underlying issue and we need to address that underlying issue: we aren't walking by the Spirit. Because if we walk by the Spirit, we will not gratify the desires of the flesh. Perhaps, before we get to work on that long list of things to do to be better Christians, we should start there.
5 comments:
Walk by the Spirit... what does that mean? as you mentioned in the previous text; we need the will and desire to do, which is a gift of God. so can we conclude that walking by the Spirit is equally unobtainable apart from God's good Graces? i can see the parallel, but i also see the need to participate and engage with God to know what pleases Him.
It is an interesting dichotomy that two facts -- God is at work in us to will and do His good pleasure AND we need to work out our salvation. We need to engage with God to know what pleases Him; He enables that.
Is it remotely possible that there really is no such thing as free thinking? when we consider the degree to which we depend upon God's keeping our very being alive, perhaps even our very sense of freedom of thought is just an illusion. much like when we are on our way to work, we make plans to get there, but we are inundated by a multitude of circumstances that alter our plans along the way, and yet when we arrive, we pat ourselves on the back and say "i did it my way"... i realize to claim that even our thoughts are governed by God is somewhat a stretch, but you have to admit that, If God is wholly sovereign, then your mind is His, to control and modify as he sees fit. if an idle mind is the devils playground, to be controlled and manipulated; then i follows that God abides in, and controls the mind that is set on Him.
ok i am out of my debt now... help me mister wizard...
We were discussing a similar passage last night. In John 14, Jesus says repeatedly that those who love Him will "keep" His commandments or His "word". The converse would be that those who don't keep His commandments or His word, or deny the existence of His commandments, don't love Him.
I think the fact that we can't keep His commandments or walk by the spirit without His grace and power simply points us back to God's sovereignty and how unable we are to do things for ourselves.
Yes, Craig.
Bob, the suggestion of "no free thinking" is similar to "no free will". If we are saying that the only "freedom" in these things is whatever God causes, we eliminate "free thinking" and "free will" and culpability and a God who is untainted by sin. I go closer to the "soft determinism" side where God allows freedom (of choice and thought) to the degree that He allows it and no further, leaving us (or Judas (Luke 22:22) or Pilate and Herod (Acts 4:27-28) or Joseph's brothers (Gen 50:20)) culpable for their sin while still using their sin to accomplish His intentions.
Post a Comment