Like Button

Monday, October 05, 2026

Premises, Premises

The word, “premise,” comes from the Latin, “praemissa,” meaning simply “the thing that goes before.” Simply, and yet, significantly. A premise is a proposition supposed or proved prior as a basis of argument or inference. It is a presupposition. And it is important. You see, if you start from a solid base, you can draw solid conclusions, but we all know how that whole “house built on sand” thing (Matt 7:24-27) goes. Not good.

Every person approaches Scripture with presuppositions. We do not come to the text as neutral observers, but as fallen creatures shaped by our culture, experiences, traditions, desires, and beliefs. The question is not whether we have premises, but whether those premises are true and whether they are derived from Scripture itself. Many misunderstandings of God's Word arise not because the text is unclear, but because we bring faulty assumptions to it.

One of the most common errors is the assumption that the Bible exists primarily to make us happy. If personal fulfillment becomes the controlling premise, then passages concerning suffering, self-denial, repentance, holiness, and perseverance will inevitably be misunderstood. Scripture certainly speaks of joy, but it places God's glory and our conformity to Christ above our temporary comfort. When happiness becomes the lens through which we read the Bible, suffering is often viewed as a sign of failure rather than one of God's tools for sanctification.

Another common premise is that modern culture possesses the authority to determine right and wrong. When cultural values become the standard, Scripture is no longer allowed to speak with authority over human behavior. Instead, biblical teachings must be reshaped and reinterpreted to fit the spirit of the age. Yet throughout history, God's Word has stood in judgment over every culture. The Bible does not conform itself to society; rather, society is called to conform itself to God's revealed truth.

Some approach Scripture with the belief that God exists primarily to fulfill their personal dreams and ambitions. This assumption reverses the biblical order. Scripture teaches that God is sovereign, and we are His creatures. We exist for His purposes, not He for ours. When this premise is forgotten, biblical promises are often transformed into guarantees of health, success, prosperity, or personal achievement that the text never intended.

A particularly dangerous premise is the belief that human beings are fundamentally good. If man is assumed to be basically righteous, then the Bible's teaching concerning sin appears excessive and the gospel becomes little more than self-improvement. Scripture, however, presents a far different picture. Humanity is fallen, separated from God, and incapable of saving itself. Only when we understand the depth of our sin do we appreciate the greatness of God's grace.

Many interpretive mistakes also arise from the assumption that every passage is addressed directly to the individual reader. While all Scripture is profitable for believers, not every command, promise, or circumstance was originally directed to us. Sound interpretation requires understanding what a text meant to its original audience before determining how it applies to believers today. When historical context is ignored, promises made to Israel, kings, prophets, or apostles are often misapplied.

Another obstacle to proper interpretation is the tendency to approach Scripture through a rigid theological system rather than allowing Scripture itself to shape theology. While theological systems can help organize biblical truth, they become problematic when they control the interpretation of difficult passages. A faithful student of Scripture must always be willing to allow God's Word to correct his conclusions.

Modern readers are also influenced by the widespread assumption that a text means whatever it means to an individual reader. This view places meaning in the eye of the beholder rather than in the inspired intention of the author. Yet biblical interpretation is not an exercise in personal creativity. The goal is to discover what God intended to communicate through the human authors He inspired.

Another faulty premise is that the Old Testament is largely irrelevant because Christians live under the New Testament. Such thinking ignores the fact that Jesus and the apostles continually appealed to the Old Testament as authoritative Scripture. The New Testament does not replace the Old Testament; it fulfills and explains it. The story of redemption cannot be understood apart from the foundation that the Old Testament provides.

The book of Job exposes another common assumption: that all suffering is the direct result of personal sin. Job's friends relentlessly defended this premise, yet God ultimately condemned their counsel. Scripture teaches that suffering can result from many causes, including living in a fallen world, God's sanctifying work, testing, persecution, or purposes known only to Him.

Perhaps the most pervasive error of all is the assumption that the Bible is primarily about us. Modern readers often place themselves at the center of every narrative and ask, "What does this say about me?" before asking, "What does this reveal about God?" In reality, Scripture is first and foremost the revelation of God, His character, His purposes, and His redemptive work in Christ. We find our place in the story only after we understand that the story belongs to Him.

Ultimately, every interpretation rests on a foundation of presuppositions. Good interpretation begins by examining those presuppositions in the light of Scripture. Many disagreements about biblical meaning are not really disagreements about individual verses, but disagreements about the assumptions brought to those verses. The safest approach is to begin where Scripture itself begins: God is holy and sovereign, mankind is sinful, Christ is sufficient, and God's Word is authoritative. When those foundational premises govern our thinking, we are far less likely to impose our ideas upon the text and far more likely to hear what God has actually said.

3 comments:

Lorna said...

“Many misunderstandings of God's Word arise not because the text is unclear, but because we bring faulty assumptions to it.”

This assertion of yours was followed by ten good examples of such faulty assumptions--and I would guess there are as many more questionable premises as there are people! In our rebellious state, we really want to overwrite God’s Word with our word, it seems. There are countless books on the topic of “how to properly interpret and study the Bible,” so we know that by default we would probably not do it correctly. (No wonder there is so much false teaching within Christendom!) I can see that each of your examples could be its own study, and perhaps you have posted about all of them over the years, in a quest to promote biblical thinking. I can also testify that I have encountered every one of your examples (whether expressed subtlety or more overtly), either in myself, in other individuals, in whole groups of people or churches, or promoted in certain schools of thought or philosophies. The human mind can work in inventive ways when the heart is set against its sovereign Creator.

“The safest approach is to begin where Scripture itself begins: God is holy and sovereign, mankind is sinful, Christ is sufficient, and God's Word is authoritative.”

This closing thought of yours is a very good starting point and will set the sincere Bible student on the right path and in the right direction to find truth for living--something no one in his/her right mind would spurn.

David said...

People will often ignore Christianity because of the disperate beliefs between denominations. But the problem with that attack is that it assumes everyone that reads the Bible reads it from a neutral place. As you said, we all bring our prepositions to the Bible, especially when we are immature, new believers. When we don't allow the Bible to correct our assumptions we end up with divisions. It is not the fault of Scripture being unclear, but us being at different levels of sin-corrupted minds.

Lorna said...

You make a good point, David. It seems to me that the various denominations began forming when one person (at least) felt their own interpretation was superior to or more legitimate than all the others currently in existence. I suppose the fact that that one maverick gained like-minded supporters--enough to create a separate group that persisted rather than peter out as a passing fad (like many cults, sects, and fringe groups have done)--possibly gives the disparate beliefs you mention some validity. Or it could be something else entirely. Personally, I believe that the purest form of biblical faith ideally wouldn’t fall into any particular denomination--for reasons including the one you mention; perhaps that is too idealistic of me.

P.S. I am assuming (or presupposing ;) that you meant “presuppositions” above, rather than “prepositions.”