Like Button

Thursday, July 23, 2026

The God Who Refuses to Apologize

One of the recurring surprises of reading the Bible is discovering how often God refuses to behave the way we think a “proper” God should. We come to Scripture with a mental picture of a deity who is endlessly patient, predictably kind, and—if we’re honest—mostly committed to keeping us comfortable. Then we actually read the text, and the God who speaks there seems blissfully unaware of our expectations. Or perhaps aware, but certainly unimpressed.

Take His sovereignty. We tend to imagine God as a polite ruler who respects human autonomy, the way a modern HOA respects homeowner opinions—at least enough to pretend they matter. You know. "God is a gentleman." But in Isaiah 45:7, God says He forms light and creates darkness, makes peace and creates calamity. Paul adds in Romans 9:18 that God has mercy on whom He wills and hardens whom He wills. These are not the words of a deity campaigning for reelection. These are the words of the Creator who acts freely, wisely, and without any need to consult the advisory board of human feelings. Job learned this when God answered him out of a whirlwind (Job 38:1), which is never the sign that a gentle fireside chat is about to begin.

God’s justice confronts us in similar ways. We assume sincerity should soften consequences. “But I meant well” is our favorite defense. Scripture, however, is full of moments where God seems to say, “Yes, I noticed—but that’s not the point.” Nadab and Abihu offered unauthorized fire and were consumed (Lev 10:1–2). Uzzah touched the ark to steady it—something any of us might have done—and was struck down (2 Sam 6:6–7). Ananias and Sapphira lied about a donation and fell dead (Acts 5:1–11). These stories unsettle us because they reveal a God whose holiness is not flexible. Hebrews 12:29 calls Him a consuming fire, not a flickering candle you keep on the mantle for ambiance.

Holiness itself is one of Scripture’s most disruptive themes. We often treat holiness as spiritual serenity, the kind of thing you might find in a quiet monastery or a well curated Instagram feed. The Bible treats holiness as dangerous. At Sinai, boundaries were erected so the people wouldn’t die by approaching God casually (Exo 19:12–13). Isaiah saw the Lord and immediately assumed he was finished (Isa 6:5). The temple was built with layers of separation, each one a reminder that God’s presence is life giving but lethal to the unclean. Holiness is not merely beautiful—it is radioactive purity. Handle with care.

Even God’s love challenges our assumptions. We imagine divine love as universal sentiment, evenly distributed like sprinkles on a cupcake. Scripture presents a love that chooses, covenants, and binds itself. God loved Israel because He set His love upon them (Deut 7:7–8), not because they were lovable. Jesus speaks in John 17 of those given to Him out of the world. Paul describes a love in Romans 8 that is inseparable for those who belong to Christ. God is represented as a father who disciplines and chastizes His children out of love (Heb 12:6). Biblical love is not vague kindness; it is fierce, committed, and particular. It is less like a Hallmark card and more like a marriage vow.

Then there is God’s patience. We often assume patience means endless tolerance. Scripture shows patience with a purpose—and a limit. The world of Noah discovered this when centuries of divine forbearance gave way to the flood (Genesis 6–7). Paul warns in Romans 2:4–5 that God’s kindness is meant to lead to repentance, not enable rebellion. Revelation portrays a God who delays judgment but does not cancel it (Rev 6:10–11). Patience is real, but it is not infinite. God is longsuffering, not indulgent.

And what of God’s wrath? Modern sensibilities recoil at the idea. We treat wrath as beneath God, as if goodness must exclude anger. Yet Scripture presents wrath as the necessary expression of holiness. Nahum celebrates God’s wrath because it protects the oppressed (Nah 1:2–3). Romans 1 describes wrath as God giving people over to their desires—a judgment that begins not with thunderbolts but with abandonment. At the cross, Jesus bears wrath so that justice and mercy meet without contradiction (Rom 3:25–26). Wrath is not God losing His temper; it is God being perfectly good. It is also the part of God’s character we secretly hope applies to other people more than to us.

Finally, Scripture confronts us with a God whose ways are intentionally inscrutable. We want predictability. We want explanations. We want a God who operates according to our logic. Instead, we meet a God who says, “My thoughts are not your thoughts” (Isa 55:8–9). Ecclesiastes wrestles with the perplexity of life under God’s sovereignty. Habakkuk is stunned when God uses Babylon as an instrument of judgment (Hab 1:5–6). The Bible does not hide the mystery—it highlights it. God is not confusing; He is simply not small.

All these collisions matter. They remind us that the God of Scripture is not a tame deity. He is not a cosmic therapist. He is not a sentimental grandfather. He is the holy, sovereign, just, merciful, patient, wrathful, inscrutable God who reveals Himself on His own terms. These descriptions do not contradict one another; they form a portrait of the living God—majestic, free, and utterly unlike us.

The question is not whether God fits our expectations. The question is whether we will allow Scripture to reshape them. And if that feels uncomfortable, well—welcome to the Bible.

3 comments:

Craig said...

In the middle of a conversation about Ananias and Sapphira right now. Apparently because the text does not explicitly say "YHWH struck them dead.", the question of how and why they died is a big mystery. That Peter predicted Sapphira's death doesn't shed any light on the subject at all. I did learn that the problem wasn't lying to YHWH as the text does tell us, but in violating the system which required the sale of property to take care of the poor. Imagine my surprise when I discovered that the text was mistaken.

I do agree that YHWH's holiness and sovereignty are the two most difficult of His attributes for us to accept. We cannot accept a God like that and feel the need to impose our feelings about how He should rule on Him.

I always appreciate your posts on topics like this.

Lorna said...

“Welcome to the Bible,” indeed. It is full of surprises, especially about God’s nature and His ways. I for one will admit that the God I have come to know through Scripture--in full concurrence with all you wrote here--does not match my former, sorely uninformed perception of Him. Clearly, I did not really know God at all … whereas now I know Him much better. I can only praise the Lord for that blessed enlightenment and revelation!

P.S. IMO this is one of your best posts--well-developed and full of truths about God’s sovereignty, justice, holiness, love, patience, wrath, and mysterious ways--all expressed in one well-written essay; plus, it had a fair number of little references that made me chuckle--a totally impactful, inspiring, and enjoyable read!

David said...

The God revealed in the Bible is the only perfectly coherent god described in any other "sacred" text. Moreover, He is the only God I desire to be beholden to. The plurality of gods in other polytheistic religions are vain and petty, basically more powerful versions of us. The god of the other monotheistic religions is unjust and incoherent. The Triune God of Scripture alone is the only one that makes any sense to me to be worthy of following and devoting my life and love to.