I grew up with King James (the version, not the actual king ... I'm not THAT old), so a lot of Scripture is stuck in my head in King James. Like the "Charity" chapter where we learn cool things like "charity vaunteth not itself" (1 Cor 13:4) and "seeketh not her own" (1 Cor 13:5). (I didn't even know charity had a gender.) Imagine a 12-year-old reading "Charity vaunteth not itself" and trying to make sense of it. "Let's see ... when we give things to worthy causes, it shouldn't ... vaunt itself? I thought this was English." So, like, the New American Standard (1977 edition) offered, "love does not brag" and it was a whole new ballgame. "Oh! 'Charity' equals 'love' and ' vaunteth' equals 'brag.' Got it." Like some code translator.
You can see how language gave me a hard time back then. I get it. What I don't get is why we miss so much. If "love" is "a strong feeling of warm personal attachment or deep affection," what in the world is Paul writing about (1 Cor 13:4-8)? Some makes sense. "Not rude." Sure, if you have strong feelings for someone, you won't be rude ... I guess. But "does not seek its own"? Don't we all seek our own? Isn't our standard question, "What's in it for me?" Don't lovers approach marriage with "Is he/she good for me?" Is that not the singular question of the human race? "What do I get out of it?" But this text tells us love does not pursue what it wants for the one giving love, but for the one being loved.
Try as we might, we don't seem to get this world's notion that "love is a warm feeling" out of our head. No thinking person can read Paul's description of love in the 13th chapter of 1 Corinthians and conclude it is merely some kind of feeling. It's not rational. It makes no sense. Conversely, when you take the commands, for instance, to love God and love your neighbor, pull out "love" and replace it with the text in 1 Corinthians 13, it becomes huge. We're not talking about having affection for God and your fellow man. We're talking about a massive, selfless, giving decision to pursue the best for someone else ... beginning with God. It's all very clear ... and somehow we just don't seem to notice it ... almost every time we talk about love and God and our fellow human beings.
Your first paragraph relates my biggest issue with the King James Version of the Bible--its antiquated vocabulary and sentence structure. I adopted the New King James Version shortly upon its publication and haven’t looked back (in the spirit of 1 Cor. 14:9: “So likewise you, unless you utter by the tongue words easy to understand, how will it be known what is spoken? For you will be speaking into the air.”).
ReplyDeleteRegarding understanding 1 Cor. 13: I liked these practical interpretations of love in action (taken from Growing Your Faith: How To Mature In Christ, by Jerry Bridges). The author writes this:
“First Corinthians 13 is the classic description of love. If we rephrased the virtues of love in 1 Corinthians 13 in terms of motivational statements, they might sound something like this:
I am patient with you because I love you and want to forgive you.
I am kind to you because I love you and want to help you.
I do not envy your possessions or your gifts because I love you and want you to have the best.
I do not boast about my attainments because I love you and want to hear about yours.
I am not proud because I love you and want to esteem you before myself.
I am not rude because I love you and care about your feelings.
I am not self-seeking because I love you and want to meet your needs.
I am not easily angered by you because I love you and want to overlook your offenses.
I do not keep a record of your wrongs because I love you, and “love covers a multitude of sins.”
I can answer why we miss so much. Because we don't want God in our thinking. Even in our redeemed state, we are always at battle with the old desire to idolize anything but God. Only with prayer, humility, and study (and the guiding of the Holy Spirit) can we overcome our natural inclination.
ReplyDelete