Cna yuo raed tihs?No matter ... I'm still in favor of proper English, even without the support of Cambridge University.
i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Great ... Just Great
I'm an advocate of using correct grammar and proper spelling. I think it improves communication. So when I get something like this in my email, well, it just doesn't help me at all ...
Fnnuy!
ReplyDeleteI hvae seen tihs bfeore Stan, turly azaming if you rlealy tihnk aubot it. Dlnifitey not shemoting one slouhd mkae a hibat of, tughoh, at lseat in my opnioin.
Blsiegsns, Soctt
Oh, did that hurt to write that way? I don't even think I could do it ... certainly not on purpose.
ReplyDelete