One of the greatest dangers facing the church is not open hostility to Christianity or the obvious adoption of pagan religion. Most Christians can easily recognize a false religion when it presents itself openly. We can usually spot the error when Christianity is blended with voodoo, Eastern mysticism, ancestor worship, or occult practices. Those forms of syncretism are relatively easy to identify because the foreign influences are visible. The more dangerous form of syncretism is far subtler. It occurs when Christians continue to use biblical language while quietly adopting the assumptions, values, and priorities of the surrounding culture.
This is not a new problem. In fact, it is one of the oldest spiritual dangers recorded in Scripture. Throughout the Old Testament, Israel continually attempted to worship the Lord while simultaneously borrowing from the nations around them. God repeatedly warned them, “Learn not the way of the nations” (Jer 10:2). Yet they persisted in blending the worship of Yahweh with the practices of Canaan. The result was not a complete rejection of God, but a corruption of true worship. They kept the name of God while redefining what faithfulness to Him looked like.
The same danger exists today.
One example is the tendency to merge Christianity with nationalism. Love for one’s country is not sinful. In fact, gratitude for the blessings God has given through our nation is entirely appropriate. The problem arises when believers begin to see their nation as occupying the same place in God’s redemptive plan that Israel occupied under the Old Covenant. Passages such as 2 Chronicles 7:14 are frequently applied directly to America as though God were speaking covenant promises to a modern nation-state. Yet the New Testament directs our attention elsewhere. Paul reminds believers that “our citizenship is in heaven” (Php 3:20). Peter calls Christians “strangers and pilgrims” (1 Peter 2:11). The writer of Hebrews says that God’s people seek “a better country, that is, an heavenly” (Heb 11:16). While earthly citizenship has value, the kingdom to which we ultimately belong is the kingdom of Christ, a kingdom that is “not of this world” (John 18:36).
Another form of syncretism blends biblical faith with consumerism and materialism. Modern culture teaches that success is measured by wealth, comfort, possessions, and status. Those assumptions often seep into the church. Prosperity becomes evidence of God’s favor, while hardship is viewed as evidence that something must be wrong. Yet Jesus warned that life does not consist of possessions (Luke 12:15). He instructed His followers not to lay up treasures on earth, where moth and rust corrupt, but to lay up treasures in heaven (Matt 6:19-21). Paul told Timothy that those who desire to be rich “fall into temptation and a snare” and that “the love of money is the root of all evil” (1 Tim 6:9-10). Scripture never condemns wealth itself, but it consistently warns against adopting the world’s definition of success.
Perhaps nowhere is modern syncretism more evident than in the influence of therapeutic culture. Our culture often assumes that mankind’s greatest problem is unhappiness, emotional discomfort, or low self-esteem. As a result, Christianity is increasingly presented as a path to personal fulfillment rather than reconciliation with God. Sermons become motivational speeches. Repentance is softened into self-improvement. Sin is redefined as dysfunction. Yet Scripture gives a very different diagnosis of the human condition. “All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23). The heart is “deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked” (Jer 17:9). Jesus said that evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, and other sins proceed from within the heart (Mark 7:21-23). The gospel addresses emotional wounds, but only because it first addresses the deeper problem of sin.
Another subtle form of syncretism is the adoption of radical individualism. Modern culture teaches that personal autonomy is the highest good. We are told to follow our hearts, live our truth, and trust our feelings. That philosophy has increasingly influenced the church. Many now assume that personal experience carries more authority than Scripture. Yet the Bible repeatedly warns against trusting our own understanding. “There is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death” (Pro 14:12). We are instructed to “Trust in YHWH with all your heart and do not lean on your own understanding” (Pro 3:5). Jesus did not invite people to affirm themselves; He said, “If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me” (Luke 9:23).
The danger in every form of syncretism is the same. It leaves biblical words intact while replacing their biblical meanings. The church continues to speak about truth, love, freedom, justice, blessing, faith, and salvation, but those concepts gradually become shaped by the spirit of the age rather than the Word of God. This is precisely why Paul warned the Romans, “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind” (Rom 12:2). He cautioned the Colossians, “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ” (Col 2:8). Syncretism is not minor and it’s not good. "Go out from their midst, and be separate from them, says the Lord" (2 Cor 6:17).
I have been growing my daily morning prayer for some time now. Recently I added forgiveness for my sins of ignorance. I'm sure there are things I do that are appropriate for my culture but are not to God. They may be things that in themselves are morally neutral and only turn to sin when done without the right heart attitude. I also believe I'm in the minority. I don't think most Christian realize how much their culture is influencing their Christianity. But it's the little changes that have decimated the Church in the West for the last couple hundred years. Using secular terms and ideas without realizing we're validating them while arguing against them. It concerns me when I hear Christians speak of homosexuality as a state of being like the world does, rather than a set of actions. By speaking of "homosexuals" as a type of person, we undermine ourselves. Or when speaking about the differences of sexual approach between men and women and citing evolutionary biology as to why men seek multiple partners and women seek fewer. When we talk like that, we open ourselves to the credence of biological authoritarianism. Combine that with an impersonal moral authority and what exactly are we arguing about then?
ReplyDeleteThis is good food for thought and reflection today. The worldly influences you highlighted are indeed subtle distortions of biblical Christianity that serve to promote “another gospel” and hamper one’s Christian journey. All of them seem to encourage one to look to the wrong source of truth and fulfillment, whether it be temporal political systems, earthly success and acquisition, humanistic psychobabble, or one’s personally contrived purpose-driven identity. An overfocus on any of these distractions would lead to replacing kingdom objectives with worldly entanglements and deceptions. I think that it takes a good dose of discernment, intensive study of God’s Word, pursuit of sound teaching (from others with discernment), and constant vigilance to keep these (and other) influences at bay as we seek to have the mind of Christ. I appreciate this reminder today to check my focus.
ReplyDelete“We can usually spot the error when Christianity is blended with voodoo, Eastern mysticism, ancestor worship, or occult practices. Those forms of syncretism are relatively easy to identify because the foreign influences are visible.”
ReplyDeleteOf those few that you mentioned, I do believe that some aspects of Eastern mysticism have effectively crept west into modern Christianity, helping to create the “New Age” ideology, as well as contributing to the promotion of practices such as “mindful” meditation, “contemplative or centering” prayer, “Christian yoga,” self-actualization, belief in a “life force,” and more. These elements have been adapted to Western tastes and tweaked enough to sound Christian--thereby slipping through the door into the Church to adulterate the Body.
All of your example are very good. The line between being a Christian who is patriotic and a Christian who wants to place the US in a position that is not appropriate can be a little fuzzy. Yet one is appropriate, one is not.
ReplyDeleteConsumer culture has infiltrated the Church as we see way to many who church shop looking for the perfect fit, rather than Biblical fidelity.
Yeah Vudu in Haiti is a great example. They've taken African religions, and mixed them with Roman Catholicism, to the point that most Haitians will identify as RC while continuing to practice Vudu at the same time.
Yes, Craig, you're right. There IS a sort of "patriotism" commanded in the Bible where we pray for those in authority, so it's not INappropriate. We just do it wrong most of the time.
Delete